(This piece was written on March 31, 2015)
A friend sent me a link to the Deepika Padukone advertisement for Vogue, seeking my views on yet another ‘breaking the internet’ video. The first thought on my mind was whether he (or for that matter the 12300 odd who have already tweeted to #mychoice) would have even watched the video if it was filmed on Bhumi Pedneker. Actually, she would have had a stronger reason to do this, probably to promo her film.
Ít has become fashionable to call on women to accept their body types. Svelte celebrities, living on carb free, closely supervised diets and exercise regimes are falling over each other (encouraged by an unimaginative media) to advice us to love and to be ourselves. The only issue is that the ladies feel the need to essay such good advice while showing that extra bit of cleavage or flashing the size zero, leggy look. It is equally ludicrous, when some of these ladies claim to be ‘foodies’ and are seen on TV tucking into greasy street-side food and claiming that they can’t keep-off such delicacies.
Surprisingly, there were more ladies out there; than men, commenting on the film, like all of them were screeching ‘liberated’. I wish I could ask how many of them are mothers of teenage children and if they are do they seriously feel that good body type is only essential for girls, today. Ask my sixteen year old boy, who is working on his abs and bicep curls. Who is just in that gawky age when he is shy to be seen bare bodied because body hair is no longer fashionable. Have we even noticed that the number of men in parlours, seeking anti-tan facials, waxing and hair straightening, are growing in numbers. The subtle messaging is success goes with and actually is ‘looking good’.
The call for comfort with body type (read size) goes with the cry to dress as per choice. What is espoused is that my dress must be accepted as a sign of rebellion. Is this new to youth? Have we not over generations had this battle of what is right or wrong dress code? Have we not seen bankers revert from dockers to lounge suits, following the global recession? I am reminded of an evening at an office conference, where the dress code read informal. A male colleague of somewhat generous proportions decided to show up in knee length shorts and a hugging round neck T-shirt, not appreciating the fine line between casual and informal. As his colleagues we found that a little difficult to handle, same as a dealer in Begusarai would react if I went for a meeting in my jeans. It might just be pertinent to point out that Deepika, herself, was seen in a very prim and proper white churidar kurta when NDTV hosted her for their talk show on depression.
As if body type and dress of choice was not enough to claim ‘empowerment’, the film moves on to claim sexual freedom. Pooh-poohing the need to remain committed in relationships, it suggests that that an ideal relationship is one where the man doesn’t question choice, number of partners to right to ‘come home at any hour’. Would the same freedom to a man liberate us more? How many women out there would be comfortable allowing the same space to their partners? Would we really say it is liberating or a sure route to rejection, depression and psychiatric intervention?
I puzzle over this male bashing and in-your-face need to express my rights as a woman. May be it is my co-ed schooling or the all-male world in which I started my career. A time when gender-diversity was not yet corporate jargon but Delhi for night travel was just as unsafe. Or maybe, I was just lucky to have a father a generation ahead of his time, who never used the phrase ‘you can’t because you are a girl’
A friend sent me a link to the Deepika Padukone advertisement for Vogue, seeking my views on yet another ‘breaking the internet’ video. The first thought on my mind was whether he (or for that matter the 12300 odd who have already tweeted to #mychoice) would have even watched the video if it was filmed on Bhumi Pedneker. Actually, she would have had a stronger reason to do this, probably to promo her film.
Ít has become fashionable to call on women to accept their body types. Svelte celebrities, living on carb free, closely supervised diets and exercise regimes are falling over each other (encouraged by an unimaginative media) to advice us to love and to be ourselves. The only issue is that the ladies feel the need to essay such good advice while showing that extra bit of cleavage or flashing the size zero, leggy look. It is equally ludicrous, when some of these ladies claim to be ‘foodies’ and are seen on TV tucking into greasy street-side food and claiming that they can’t keep-off such delicacies.
Surprisingly, there were more ladies out there; than men, commenting on the film, like all of them were screeching ‘liberated’. I wish I could ask how many of them are mothers of teenage children and if they are do they seriously feel that good body type is only essential for girls, today. Ask my sixteen year old boy, who is working on his abs and bicep curls. Who is just in that gawky age when he is shy to be seen bare bodied because body hair is no longer fashionable. Have we even noticed that the number of men in parlours, seeking anti-tan facials, waxing and hair straightening, are growing in numbers. The subtle messaging is success goes with and actually is ‘looking good’.
The call for comfort with body type (read size) goes with the cry to dress as per choice. What is espoused is that my dress must be accepted as a sign of rebellion. Is this new to youth? Have we not over generations had this battle of what is right or wrong dress code? Have we not seen bankers revert from dockers to lounge suits, following the global recession? I am reminded of an evening at an office conference, where the dress code read informal. A male colleague of somewhat generous proportions decided to show up in knee length shorts and a hugging round neck T-shirt, not appreciating the fine line between casual and informal. As his colleagues we found that a little difficult to handle, same as a dealer in Begusarai would react if I went for a meeting in my jeans. It might just be pertinent to point out that Deepika, herself, was seen in a very prim and proper white churidar kurta when NDTV hosted her for their talk show on depression.
As if body type and dress of choice was not enough to claim ‘empowerment’, the film moves on to claim sexual freedom. Pooh-poohing the need to remain committed in relationships, it suggests that that an ideal relationship is one where the man doesn’t question choice, number of partners to right to ‘come home at any hour’. Would the same freedom to a man liberate us more? How many women out there would be comfortable allowing the same space to their partners? Would we really say it is liberating or a sure route to rejection, depression and psychiatric intervention?
I puzzle over this male bashing and in-your-face need to express my rights as a woman. May be it is my co-ed schooling or the all-male world in which I started my career. A time when gender-diversity was not yet corporate jargon but Delhi for night travel was just as unsafe. Or maybe, I was just lucky to have a father a generation ahead of his time, who never used the phrase ‘you can’t because you are a girl’