Monday, 8 October 2018

Necessary but not Sufficient

 It is difficult, nay impossible, to remain unmoved by the accounts of sexual misconduct outed in the last few days. As a woman leader and for a daughter who has just embarked on her career, I had to absorb and make sense of all that is being shared.

#MeToo is a powerful movement. More power to those brave enough to have come forward. A year after Harvey Weinstein was accused of being a sexual predator, women who speak out are taken more seriously and men who abuse are more likely to pay a price. At the cost of sounding cliched, though, with great power comes great responsibility. The conversation is about sexual harassment and respecting consent. It is not about naming and shaming. That can be a manner of addressing the behaviour but one has to get to the root and change the mindset.

My moment of epiphany was on reading a tweet by a senior women professional. She was reflecting on how we got us (women) through the door, to the table and to being taken seriously. At the same time she rued not having done enough for the basic right to freedom and decency.

That, seriously got me to look back at my own career in what has all through been in traditional male bastions. Moreover, in a career in sales and marketing, I have toured extensively through Indian states and internationally. However, it was different in "our times". 

Firstly, it was our conditioning - you are accountable for your safety. So one traveled, worked, checked into a hotel and stayed put in the room. The one odd time you tried to have a drink at the bar (leave alone hotels but also in your Club) you ended up being propositioned. Over the years, you realised that you have been to great cities but hesitated to discover its culinary delights or many sights as you chose to be "careful".

What is even more important is that you sacrificed on networking and will never know whether it resulted in missed opportunities.

Secondly, as a real minority you did not present a threat. This is borne out by the fact that in areas like education, entertainment and journalism (where there has been a larger number of women for years) is where we are seeing the momentum on #MeToo. 

Thirdly, it was somewhat difficult to connect in the pre-mobile age. Permission had to be sought in person, or through the hotel house-phones. Landlines did not provide direct access to an individual. When technology changed, the need to seek permission could not be controlled.

Times have changed. 

As more women opt for a career and many despite family pressures, they will insist on equal opportunities. Not just on the job but the right to be out in public places, be seen and heard outside the confines of an office space or a single organisation. They will also have their right to unwind after a day's work in a place and in a manner that does not restrict freedom. The same that is a given for their male colleagues.

An issue that cannot be overlooked is the threat perception. The exercise of power is a game. Sexual overtures send the message that you (the lady) are weak and need me to help or promote your career. You marginalise her performance by hinting she needs your support. Further, it is not uncommon to brag about achievements and many times a particular lady gets branded as "available". Sexism is a larger bane. The men who wait on the fringes, do not predate but reserve a right to be judgmental. So, she "slept her way to the top" is a comment you may easily spread without any knowledge of the person.

It is not, therefore about controlling behaviour, it is about changing the mindset which is not restricted to men alone. The assumption that if she is out of home, opting to drink, going single to a party or staying back late -she is "available".  Naming, I fear might superficially mask behaviour but at the same time open up a host of problems for working women. As has been seen in the case of the 'moms unite for Kavanaugh', there will be many irate wives, mothers and the boy's club who would unite to berate and victimise. Also, such high profile failures will be touted as examples of sexual harassment being used as a weapon. The superficial contriteness of those called out  is threatening to trivialise the issue.

There is already intense debate on whether consensual relationship between people in a reporting relationship falls within purview of workplace harassment. An actress is contesting the sexual harassment claim made by another.  Many are opting to remain silent, while at the other end of the spectrum with television joining the fray there is much noise. Then again, one must reflect that between the Weinstein movement and the current #MeTooIndia there has been almost a year of silence. Knowing the fickle social media, the forthcoming elections might anytime divert all attention. 

Men's predation of women, risks becoming yet one more battlefield. In this battle the advantage as of now is to the men - by their sheer numbers in positions of power. It is the Sun Tzu moment for women, to step back, unite and strategise. 





8 comments:

  1. Thanks a lot madam. Appreciably for the suggestions as well as experience thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Copied from my Facebook post : (Gautam Basu)

    The article is very topical anx well articulated. However, unless the views of the society at large changes towards the victim of sexual harassment, movements line #metoo shall remain elitist and confined to a few in metros. Society has over millennia considered women as "property" (recall the use of Draupadi as an asset to be put on the gambling table) and this is the change that is most necessary. And mind it, such mindset exist across all socio-economic strata. Freedom to express harassment without fear of ridicule or reprimand should be a fundamental rights of women.
    It one word of caution, like all freedom, the structure should ensure its misuse for personal gains..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Copied from my Facebook post : Rishin Chatterjee

    A very well written article. But there remains ambiguity about consensual relationships among bosses and subordinates. It can be very demoralising for others in a team and definite qualitative measures out of policy should certainly be used to prevent such occurences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Action against manager and very rare cases the subordinate is required. Such matters must be called out. I see now that this point should have been made clearly in the piece

    ReplyDelete
  5. (Rishin Chatterjee) :

    While sexual harrassment should have no tolerance, efforts should also be made to weed out the bad apples irrespective of gender, who end up creating manipulative and toxic workplaces.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'Toxic' needs a description. I have found that about the same boss, some have huge problems of toxicity while others consider him almost messiah. This behaviour is a little more difficult to identify as it might also be used selectively against some people - mostly high performers. Then again we all need to develop some internal strength to handle the politics of a workplace. SH is a different matter, though. It is an offence

      Delete
  6. (Rishon Chatterjee) :

    By toxic I meant a department affected by the personal relationship of two people. And the various manipulations that take place to be in the good books of both the boss and the paramour (note the absence of gender use). It's a question of survival really. Having seen it closely into two organisations that I have worked in I managed to grow my defences while solely focussing on my own work. But it was tough and I longed for escape routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah! That loops back to the first point. I thought you were referring to other types of toxic behaviour . In fact I was surprised that people are not aware that a boss-subordinate relationship, particularly where manager is in a position of power is an offence. There is frankly a lot more conversations required.

      Delete